Assessing Faculty Members’ Curriculum Orientations: A Case Study of University of Kurdistan

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Education, University of Kurdistan.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to measure the dominant curriculum orientation of faculty members at the University of Kurdistan. In terms of purpose, this is an applied study, and in terms of data collection methods, it is a descriptive survey. The target population consisted of all faculty members who were teaching during the 2014-2015 academic year at the University of Kurdistan. To collect the data, the census method was employed due to the limited number of participants. The data collection tools were the “curriculum orientations inventory (COI)” developed by Cheung and Wong (2002) and modified by Mahlios, Rice, and Thomas (2004). The results of the study showed that cognitive process and academic rationalism were the most dominant orientations of the faculty members. The results also showed that there is a positive relationship between the faculty members' curriculum orientation and their expertise.

Keywords


Artzt, A., F, & Armour-Thomas, E. (1996). Evaluation of instructional practice in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Ashour, R., Khasawneh, S., Abu-Alruz, J., & Alsharqawi, S. (2012). Curriculum orientations of pre-service teachers in Jordan: A required reform initiative for Professional development. Teacher Development, 16 (3), 345-360.
Balderston, A., J. (2000). Knowledge & University. Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 26, No, 1.
Bas, G. (2013). Curriculum Design Orientations Preference Scale of Teachers: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice - 13(2): 981-991.
Brown, D. F. & Rose, T.D. (1995). Self-Reported Classroom Impact of Teachers' Theories about Learning and Obstacles to Implementation. Action in Teacher Education, 17(1), 20-29.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: beliefs and knowledge, in: D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee(Eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology, 708–725 (New York, Simon & Schuster Macmillian).
Cheung, D, & Wong H. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. The Curriculum Journal. 13(2): 225-248.
Cheung, D. (2000). Measuring Teachers' Meta-Orientations to Curriculum: Application of Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68:2, 149-165. To link to this article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598500.
Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Science teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30: 357–75.
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S., Shawn, M., & Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3: 159-179.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittrock, M. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Connelly, F. M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3(2 & 3): 61-77.
Constantin, C. (2013). The necessity to improve quality to improve quality inhigher education services: case of Romania. Polish journal of management studies, Vol 8: 57-65.
Crummey, M. A. (2007). Curriculum orientations of alternative education teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas the Graduate School, Kansas. Retrieved January 28, 2010, from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (Publication No. AAT 3297623)
Dahlin, B., Watkins, D. A., & Ekholm, M. (2001). The role of assessment in student learning: The views of Hong Kong and Swedish lecturers. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. (pp. 47-74). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
DasGupta, S. (2005). Pillai’s trace test. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Published Online: 15 JUL. DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a13067
Delandshere, G., & Jones J. H. (1999). Elementary teachers' beliefs about assessment and mathematics: A case of as assessment paralysis. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(3): 216-240.
Dow, P. (1991). Schoolhouse politics, Lessons from the Sputnik Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eisner, E. & Vallance, E. (1974). Five conceptions of curriculum: their roots and implications for curriculum planning, in Eisner, E. and Vallance, E. (eds.) Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. California: Mc Cutchan Publishing Corp.: 1-18.
Eisner, E. (1985). Five basic orientations to the curriculum. In the educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs’. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. (2002). The Educational Imagination on the Design and Evaluation of School Programs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Foil, J. (2008). Determining the curriculum orientations of public school administrators using the modified curriculum orientation inventory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas the Graduate School, Kansas.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88– 140.
Horn, N. (2011). Curriculum orientation of virtual teachers: A basic interpretive study of secondary teachers’ development of curriculum orientations. In M. Koehler, & P. Mishra, (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 1857-1860). Chesepeake, VA: AACE.
Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the Modified-curriculum orientations inventory. The Curriculum Journal Vol. 20, No. 2, June 2009, 103–120.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
Karami, M., bahmanabadi, S., & esmaili, A. (2012). optimal decision making structure of the curriculum of higher education: the perspective of faculty and curriculum experts. Research on curriculum planning, Volume II, No. 7, 92-104. (In Persian)
Kliebard, H. (2004). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Longstreet, W. S., & Shane, H. G. (1993). Curriculum for a new millennium. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lovat, T., Smith D. (1995). Curriculum: Action on Reflection Revisited (3rd edn). Sydney: Social Science Press.
Mahlios, M., S., Rice, & K. Thomas. (2004). Teachers’ views of curriculum: the hedgehog v. the fox. Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the American Educational Studies Association, November 3–7, in Kansas City, Missouri.
Maleki, H, & Salimi, J. (2017). Interdisciplinary curriculum in higher education (Basics, Principles, Approaches and Patterns) .2 edition, Tehran: SAMT publication. (In Persian)
McLaughlin, M. W., & Marsh, D. D. (1978). Staff development and school change. Teachers College Record, 8o (I): 69-94.
McNeil, J. D. (1996). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction (5th Ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Miller, J., P. (1983). The education spectrum: Orientations to curriculum. New York: Longman.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19:317-328.
Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2009).Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues (Fifth Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Pajares, M., F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3): 307- 332.
Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum planning: A handbook for professionals. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Rex, L. A., & Nelson, M. C. (2004). How teachers’ professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106(6): 1288-1331.
Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 8i, 50I-522.
Spencer, H. (1861). Education: Intellectual, Moral and Physical. London, Williams and Norgate. Reprinted in 1932 with an Introduction by F.A. Cavenagh. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Tanner, D., & Tanner. L. (1995) Curriculum development: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: MacMillan.
Vallance, E. (1986). A second look at conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Theory into Practice, 25:24-30.
Van Driel, Jan H., Astrid, M. W. Bulte, & Nico, V. (2008) Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 1, 107–122